Kamis, 08 Mei 2014
What are the dangers from using drugs?
The dangers
Drug use can
never be 100 per cent safe but it is not always as dangerous as many people
think. The dangers of drug use depend on drug, set and setting factors.
People who consume less drugs, the consequences will be the same as those who consumed a lot of drugs (although people who consume drugs affected many more hazards)
The basic
principle is that drug dangers are the result of interactions between drug, set
and setting.
The drug
Drugs are
not all the same. Different drugs have different dangers associated with them.
Some drugs
(such as alcohol, heroin and tranquillisers) have a sedative effect which slow
down the way the body and brain function. They can have a numbing effect that
produces drowsiness if a lot is taken. Other drugs (such as amphetamine,
cocaine, crack and ecstasy) have a stimulant effect giving a rush of energy and
making people more alert. A third group of drugs (such as LSD and magic
mushrooms and to a lesser extent cannabis and ecstasy) have a hallucinogenic
effect. This means they tend to alter the way the user feels, sees, hears,
tastes or smells.
Sedative drugs like alcohol and heroin can
lead to fatal overdose if a lot is taken. They can also affect co-ordination
making accidents more likely. Use of sedatives can also lead to physical
dependence and withdrawal symptoms while others drugs like cannabis cannot.
Stimulant drugs can produce anxiety or panic
attacks particularly if taken in large quantities. They can also be
particularly dangerous for people who have heart or blood pressure problems.
Hallucinogenic drugs sometimes produce very
disturbing experiences and may lead to erratic or dangerous behaviour by the
user, especially if they are already unstable. And of course some drugs are
legal to use and others are not. Being arrested and getting a conviction can
lead to all sorts of problems.
The dangers
of drug use will also depend on:
- How much is taken. The more that is taken the greater the danger. Taking too much of a sedative drug can lead to a fatal overdose. Taking a large dose of a stimulant drug can lead to panic attacks or even in extreme cases, psychotic behaviour (where all sense of reality is lost). Taking a large dose of a hallucinogenic drug may lead to disturbing experiences. Taking a high dose of a many drugs can lead to a lack of co-ordination and increase the likelihood of accidents.
- How often the drug is taken. The more often a drug is taken, the greater the risks to your health, particularly if the body hasn’t had time to recover. With some drugs a tolerance can develop and more needs to be taken in order to keep getting an effect. If heavy, frequent use is followed by a period of non-use tolerance levels drop. Taking the same amount of drug needed with high tolerance levels can bring on an overdose, especially with drugs like heroin. Not all drugs produce tolerance. LSD has its own safeguard against tolerance. If taken too frequently it just stops working. No matter how much is taken there will be no effect at all.
- Other things in drugs. Many illegal drugs, especially in powder or pill form, have other drugs or substances mixed in with them. These can change the effect of the drugs and contribute to dangers.
- Drug mixtures. Combining drugs can produce unpredictable and sometimes dangerous effects. In particular, mixtures of sedative drugs can be very dangerous. Many reported drug overdoses involve mixtures of alcohol and tranquillisers or opiates.
- How a drug is taken. The method of use will influence the effect the drug has and its possible dangers. Injecting drugs has a very quick and intense effect. Snorting or inhaling drugs can also have a quick but slightly less intensive effect. Smoking drugs produces a slower, more subtle effect sometimes. The slowest effect of all is eating or drinking a drug.
Drug dangers
also vary with the method used to take them:
- Injecting is particularly risky because it is difficult to know how much is being taken. Injection also carries the risk of infection by blood borne diseases if any injecting equipment is shared. Highest profile recently has been given to HIV, the virus that leads to AIDS, but there are also risks from Hepatitis B and C, another very serious blood borne disease.
- Eating or drinking a drug can be risky if people take a lot in one go. The effects tend to be slow but once they come on it is too late to do anything about it. Examples are drinking too much alcohol in a short space of time or eating a lump of cannabis. In such cases people can suddenly feel very drunk or stoned and become very disorientated.
- Snorting drugs like amphetamine or cocaine powder up the nose on a regular basis can lead to damage to the nasal membranes although this risk has sometimes been exaggerated.
- There are more or less dangerous ways of inhaling solvents such as glues, gases and aerosols. Squirting solvents into a large plastic bag and then placing the bag over the head has lead to death by suffocation. Squirting aerosols or butane straight down the throat has lead to deaths through freezing of the airways. Squirting onto a rag or small bag then inhaling is not as dangerous.
- Smoking a drug is a relatively less dangerous method of use although regular smoking can damage the respiratory system especially if the drug is smoked with tobacco, as is often the case with cannabis.
Effect Of Drugs
The effects
and dangers of drugs are influenced by many things. Personal factors involving
the person who is using the drugs can be just as important as the drugs being used.
The drug
experience and the expectations of the user are important. Many young people
experimenting with drugs for the first time will be unsure about what to do or
what to expect. This ignorance and lack of experience can itself be dangerous.
The mental
or psychological state of the drug user is very important. The mood people are
in when they take drugs influences the effects and dangers of drug use. If they
are anxious, depressed or unstable they are more likely to have disturbing
experiences when using drugs. They can become more anxious and disorientated,
possibly aggressive, 'freak out' and do crazy things or take too much etc. As a
general rule someone who is happy and stable is more likely to use more
carefully and not be so badly affected.
Other things
about the person which may effect drug dangers include:
- If they have physical health problems like heart disease, high blood pressure, epilepsy, diabetes, asthma or liver problems, drug use could be more dangerous and possibly make their health problem worse.
- The drug users energy levels at the time of consuming drugs can also be important. If they are tired at the time of use then it may have a different or more extreme effect than if they are fresh and full of energy.
- If the user has a low body weight the same amount of drugs may effect them more than heavier people. Also people who have eating disorders like anorexia or bulimia can find that drug use makes their eating difficulties even worse.
- Males and females can experience drugs in different ways. This is both because of their different physical make up and the different way people view male and female drug use. On average women are of smaller body weight than men, have smaller livers as a proportion of body weight and a greater proportion of body fat. This means that, generally speaking, the same amount of drugs will have a greater effect on a woman than on a man. Obviously this will not apply with a much larger than average woman or a much smaller than average man.
- The effects and risks of drug use are also influenced by attitudes towards men and women taking drugs. Women are often seen as doubly bad if they take drugs. Male drug use is often seen as more acceptable than that of women and mothers, in particular, come in for a lot of criticism if they use drugs. Male drug users who are parents are not usually seen in the same sort of way. Sexism can also affect the experience of drug use and drug risks.
The setting
The place
where drugs are used and what people are doing at the time can influence how
dangerous it is. For example, some young people take drugs in out-of-the-way
places that are particularly dangerous like canal banks, near motorways, in
derelict buildings etc. Accidents are much more likely in these places,
especially if the user is intoxicated. Also if anything does go wrong, it is
unlikely help will be at hand or that an ambulance could easily be called.
Even if the
setting is not in itself inherently dangerous there may be other types of risks
associated with the place of use. Using or taking drugs into school has led to
substantial numbers of young people being expelled from school with drastic
effects on their future careers.
Driving a
car or riding a bicycle or operating machinery while on drugs, will greatly
increase the risks of accidents.
Drug use can
lower inhibitions, increasing the likelihood of sexual encounters. Safer sex -
eg by using condoms - will be much more difficult if the person concerned is
intoxicated. The risks of unwanted pregnancy, HIV (the virus that leads to
AIDS) and other sexually transmitted infections could be increased if people
have sex while high on alcohol or drugs. Surveys have found that many young
people have sexual encounters while under the influence of drugs, particularly
alcohol and/or cannabis.
Another
setting danger is that of people over-exerting themselves when using ecstasy.
Ecstasy gives a buzz of energy and is often used in clubs while dancing
non-stop for long periods. In some situations people have danced for hours
without a break in hot, crowded environments. They run the risk of becoming
dehydrated and getting heat exhaustion. In some cases this can be very
dangerous and it has led to a number of deaths.
'Chilling
out' - having a break from dancing, cooling off and sipping or drinking water
or fruit juice at regular intervals (not alcohol as it further dehydrates the
user) - reduces these risks.
In conclusion
There are
many possible risks and dangers involved when using drugs. To fully understand
potential risks and dangers you will need to think about drug, set and setting.
In addition
people may experience problems with drug use because of other people’s
perceptions and responses to them. Examples include conflict in family and
other personal relationships, getting thrown out of school/ college or work,
getting a criminal record, getting into debt to pay for drugs, violence
associated with drug dealing etc.
Rabu, 07 Mei 2014
Field Trip To PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka
On 11 May 2014, 8th grade of CTS doing field trip to PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka, one of the Pocari Sweat factories that located in Sukabumi.
The students followed a seminar that discuss about history of the Pocari Sweat. In that place we were also given free Pocari Sweat.
Pocari Sweat has a motto: GO SWEAT! GO ION!


Field Trip To PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka
On 11 May 2013, 8th grade of CTS doing field trip to PT. Amerta Indah Otsuka, one of the Pocari Sweat factories that located in Sukabumi.
The students followed a seminar that discuss about history of the Pocari Sweat. In that place we were also given free Pocari Sweat.
Pocari Sweat has a motto: GO SWEAT! GO ION!


Sabtu, 03 Mei 2014
Why Oreos Are As Addictive As Cocaine To Your Brain
A small new study suggests the
brain responds to Oreo cookies quite like it responds to actual drugs –
at least if you’re a rat. The “pleasure center” of the brain, the
nucleus accumbens, apparently gets just as activated in response to
Oreos as it does to cocaine and morphine, which could actually have some
major public health implications. While the study was done in rats, the
authors say it’s likely relevant to humans as well, and could explain
why people have such a hard time resisting eating an entire sleeve of
the cookies. The study, which will be presented at the Society for
Neuroscience’s annual conference next month, also made another
discovery: Rats, like humans, like to eat Oreo’s creamy center first.
To test how the animals responded to Oreos vs. drugs, the team trained rats to navigate a maze. On one side, Oreo cookies were provided, and on the other side plain rice cakes were offered. As you’d guess, the rats were significantly more likely to spend time on the Oreo side of the maze. The team also compared these results to rats who were trained with morphine or cocaine rather than Oreos. They found that regardless of what “substance” the rats were offered (Oreos, cocaine, or morphine) they spent about the same amount of time on the “drug” side of the maze.
These behavioral data aren’t so surprising, but the researchers also reported some interesting neurological results. When rats were given Oreos, a protein called c-Fos was expressed strongly in an area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens, which is well known to be active in pleasure and addiction.
“It basically tells us how many cells were turned on in a specific region of the brain in response to the drugs or Oreos,” said Connecticut College professor Joseph Schroeder, who led the research. Oreos actually activated cells in this brain area more than did either cocaine or morphine, which suggests that that magical combination of sugar and fat may be even more delectable to our brains than drugs.
“Our research supports the theory that high-fat/high-sugar foods stimulate the brain in the same way that drugs do,” Schroeder said. “It may explain why some people can’t resist these foods despite the fact that they know they are bad for them.”
The research may therefore bear some relevance to human public health issues – namely the fact that high-calorie foods are often low-priced and highly addictive. And the fallout from poor eating behaviors can be as dramatic as that from drugs, said the authors. “Even though we associate significant health hazards in taking drugs like cocaine and morphine, high-fat/high-sugar foods may present even more of a danger because of their accessibility and affordability,” said another author on the study, Jamie Honohan. “We chose Oreos not only because they are America’s favorite cookie, and highly palatable to rats, but also because products containing high amounts of fat and sugar are heavily marketed in communities with lower socioeconomic statuses.”
There’s been a heated debate about whether food addiction works in fundamentally similar ways to more “classical” addictions. Some studies have suggested some deleterious effects of sugar, and raised concerns about the effects of certain varieties of sugar and sweeteners on the brain, while others aren’t so sure. At any rate, the combination of sugar and fat seems to be particularly hard for people to resist. Certainly making healthy food available at lower costs – and marketing them in the right ways – is an ongoing issue in the “Big Food” industry, and one that’s only just beginning to change in the smallest ways.
A final oddity of the current study: the rats apparently preferred the creamy vanilla filling to the cookie itself. Said Honohan, “They would break it open and eat the middle first.” Though this isn’t likely enough to confirm that the results are applicable to humans, it does make one wonder if we’re really not so different after all.
Was quoted from:http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/267543.php
and http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oreos-may-be-as-addictive-as-cocaine-morphine/
To test how the animals responded to Oreos vs. drugs, the team trained rats to navigate a maze. On one side, Oreo cookies were provided, and on the other side plain rice cakes were offered. As you’d guess, the rats were significantly more likely to spend time on the Oreo side of the maze. The team also compared these results to rats who were trained with morphine or cocaine rather than Oreos. They found that regardless of what “substance” the rats were offered (Oreos, cocaine, or morphine) they spent about the same amount of time on the “drug” side of the maze.
These behavioral data aren’t so surprising, but the researchers also reported some interesting neurological results. When rats were given Oreos, a protein called c-Fos was expressed strongly in an area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens, which is well known to be active in pleasure and addiction.
“It basically tells us how many cells were turned on in a specific region of the brain in response to the drugs or Oreos,” said Connecticut College professor Joseph Schroeder, who led the research. Oreos actually activated cells in this brain area more than did either cocaine or morphine, which suggests that that magical combination of sugar and fat may be even more delectable to our brains than drugs.
“Our research supports the theory that high-fat/high-sugar foods stimulate the brain in the same way that drugs do,” Schroeder said. “It may explain why some people can’t resist these foods despite the fact that they know they are bad for them.”
The research may therefore bear some relevance to human public health issues – namely the fact that high-calorie foods are often low-priced and highly addictive. And the fallout from poor eating behaviors can be as dramatic as that from drugs, said the authors. “Even though we associate significant health hazards in taking drugs like cocaine and morphine, high-fat/high-sugar foods may present even more of a danger because of their accessibility and affordability,” said another author on the study, Jamie Honohan. “We chose Oreos not only because they are America’s favorite cookie, and highly palatable to rats, but also because products containing high amounts of fat and sugar are heavily marketed in communities with lower socioeconomic statuses.”
There’s been a heated debate about whether food addiction works in fundamentally similar ways to more “classical” addictions. Some studies have suggested some deleterious effects of sugar, and raised concerns about the effects of certain varieties of sugar and sweeteners on the brain, while others aren’t so sure. At any rate, the combination of sugar and fat seems to be particularly hard for people to resist. Certainly making healthy food available at lower costs – and marketing them in the right ways – is an ongoing issue in the “Big Food” industry, and one that’s only just beginning to change in the smallest ways.
A final oddity of the current study: the rats apparently preferred the creamy vanilla filling to the cookie itself. Said Honohan, “They would break it open and eat the middle first.” Though this isn’t likely enough to confirm that the results are applicable to humans, it does make one wonder if we’re really not so different after all.
Was quoted from:http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/267543.php
and http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oreos-may-be-as-addictive-as-cocaine-morphine/
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)